QRA’s GenAI tools simplify engineering artifact generation, evaluation, and prediction, refocusing engineers from tedious work to critical path development.
Our solutions streamline the intricate processes involved in specifying, designing, and certifying the extraordinary systems our customers create. By automating the artifact tasks within the development cycle, we empower organizations to focus their energy on innovation.
Trusted by:
Revolutionize the Way You Approach Development
Our tool stack addresses a broad spectrum of challenges encountered in the initial stages of development, accelerating engineers to ensure precision, consistency, and completeness.
Evaluate
QVscribe ensures clear and concise artifacts that unify stakeholders. QVscribe automatically evaluates development data quality, identifying associated risks and guiding engineers to rectify them.
Generate
Qubric collaborates with engineers to co-create missing or outdated artifacts. Qubric minimizes rework and synchronization costs to unleash the ingenuity of their human collaborators.
Predict
Predict overall artifact alignment by correlating unseen details to identify gaps, contradictions, and redundancies. Our newest tool helps teams visualize progress over the project lifecycle.
From Disjointed Data To Integrated Solutions
As complexity rises and development cycles shrink, traditional architectures buckle under pressure, impacting productivity and product quality.
Help Us Innovate: Test and Influence Our Latest Tools
What mundane tasks does your team do that you want to automate? Imagine effortlessly rewriting risky artifacts.
Join our Beta Test Group for Artifact Auto-Suggestion.
Unlock the Efficiency of Automated INCOSE Rules
Writing Clear Requirements Isn’t Easy
Organizations and engineers understand the challenge of writing clear, unambiguous requirements, as it is mundane yet not easy. However, organizations need precise artifacts for the early stages of development.
A Better Way to Write and Review Requirements
Artifact analysis tools leverage automation, natural language processing, and large language models to identify risks within your requirements documents as they are being written. This ensures that the documents are well-crafted and easily understood by project stakeholders.
Automating the INCOSE Guide for Writing Requirements
QVscribe automates INCOSE rules, industry best practices like the Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax, and your organization’s unique standards, ensuring requirements meet industry and organizational criteria.
Discover How QVscribe Automates the INCOSE Rules
Easy Approach to Requirments Syntax (EARS)
Webinar Series
The EARS Webinar Series equips teams with the tools, knowledge, and strategies required to navigate the intricacy of requirements writing processes.
Common Requirement Problem Types: ‘And’
Writing clear, unambiguous, and verifiable requirements can be a daunting task. How requirements should be written differs from natural speech patterns, where we naturally focus on ensuring our information flows nicely, sounds good, and covers all details. Often, requirements do not need flowery words. In contrast to how we naturally speak and write, requirements must be formal, textural, and singular. They convey what shall be done and by what entity.
The issue here is usually not a lack of understanding around the purpose and importance of requirements, but the struggle with implementing what we know into our authoring. Realistically, we may need a little more support or guidance to re-word and re-write our requirements. Sometimes, certain words may seem impossible to re-word or resolve, or we use certain words so frequently that we do not know another way to write what we mean. Based on your feedback and our research, we found many common problem words seen across industries within requirements.
This article will focus on the word And.
Engineering Perspectives: Essential Findings on Requirements Dynamics
Unlock valuable insights into the intricate dynamics of engineering and design with our latest survey, developed in partnership with The Engineer. With input from 159 professionals across 19 industries, our comprehensive study delves into how engineers interact with requirements, uncovering key challenges and opportunities.
Explore our industry-specific infographics to discover how these findings can enhance your organization’s approach to requirements in the ever-evolving landscape of engineering and technology.
ReqInsights: Analysis of Nearly 13,000 Requirements
We recently conducted thorough internal research and are sharing key insights from our analysis of 50 requirements documents, covering 12,955 requirements across 11 diverse industries.
Our investigation revealed an average requirement score of 2/5, with 1/5 scores comprising 56% and 5/5 scores 25%. The top issues identified were lack of imperatives (27%), cross-referencing pronouns (25%), and multiple imperatives (19%).
Examine our findings.
Mastering Requirements: A Deep Dive Into Automation and Accuracy
Webinar Series
Requirements Index and Insights
Looking for a quick overview of our recent research projects? Sample our Engineering Perspectives and ReqInsights studies, plus understand how automating INCOSE’s rules and applying EARS influenced our review process.
Inaccurate or unclear artifacts can lead to increased rework, delayed project timelines, and escalated costs, ultimately impacting productivity and project success. Through these findings, we aim to highlight the importance of precise and well-defined development data in engineering, providing actionable recommendations to enhance your organization’s approach to requirements management.
Optimize Your Requirements Process
Our solutions integrate with the requirements management platforms your team’s already using.
